About This Blog
Paul Wilcox, founding director, is Chairman and Technical Director of the WAY Group.
Paul will regularly be offering his views and opinions on a wide range of the financial issues of the day. Don’t miss what he has to say!
Recent Posts
- Homer says ‘Doh’ to DOTAS
- As the smoke clears we begin to see the flames
- Going for gold – 5 reasons to consider
- Don’t sit on the fence – you’ll only get splinters!
- IHT – avoid but don’t evade
Categories
- Adviser Funds
- Budget
- Capital Gains Tax
- Collective Funds
- DIFs
- Discretionary Management
- Economy
- Financial Legislation
- Financial Planning
- Gold
- HMRC
- IFAs
- IHT Mitigation
- Investment Management
- Investment Portfolios
- ISAs
- News
- Nil Rate Band
- Pre-Owned Assets Tax
- Professional Advisers
- Recession
- Regulation
- Tax Planning
- Trusts
Archives
- August 2010
- May 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- October 2009
- August 2009
- June 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- April 2008
- November 2007
- October 2007
- August 2007
- March 2007
- October 2006
Search This Blog
Subscribe
Bookmark & Share
Still strong reasons to run adviser funds
New guidelines on distributor influenced funds are designed to ensure customers are treated fairly and should not prevent advisers from offering their own portfolio-style collective funds.
Access to financial advisers’ own portfolio-style funds can bring benefits for clients. I outlined these benefits in a previous article, which struck a chord with a number of discretionary investment managers, some of whom already run such funds and many who do not but would like to.
Several firms have expressed concerns about the cost, inconvenience and responsibilities of taking this path, as well as the imminent impact of the retail distribution review (RDR) and the alleged negative attitude of the Financial Services Authority (FSA) towards ‘distributor influenced funds’ (DIFs).
Having been involved with DIFs since 1991, I am an avid fan of delivering discretionary investment management to clients via the most effective means: collective investment. What I mean here is delivering sound, bespoke, portfolio-style management via the most cost-effective and tax-effective route by pooling clients’ assets into collective funds.
One size does not fit all, so you will have to supplement this approach by:
(i) having more than one single strategy (fund) to suit different risk appetites and possibly capital and income objectives;
(ii) being prepared to supplement such core solutions with more specialised investments to finely tune each client’s individual portfolio solution.
Two advantages of adviser funds
There are two key arguments for clients entrusting their investment funds to their advisers’ own portfolio-style funds. First, there is far more accountability: the client can meet face-to-face with a good local and personal investment team for regular reassurance about the style and substance of the management.
Second, a good portfolio manager is not the same as a good fund manager. A portfolio manager is running portfolio substitutes and therefore has a keener eye on the overall risk aspects of managing the client’s money. A specialist fund manager works to tight specifications of where they can invest and to what extent they need to maintain liquidity.
The most recent regulatory changes have allowed collective funds to mix and match underlying funds and direct equity investment, and to blend a much wider range of asset classes. This means contemporary portfolio-style funds can effectively mirror and replace virtually any bespoke portfolio.
The right firm for the job
Several firms service the third party fund market. Some are investment management firms, which tend to have more empathy with their guest managers, and others are administration companies, which focus on large scale administration activities. Either type of firm is likely to be able to guide new entrants through the steps needed to establish their own funds.
Whether a firm should embark on this is broadly down to a handful of criteria:
* Are they authorised to perform discretionary management or do they have an associate company who is?
* Do they have sufficient clients and assets under management to make the establishment of such funds a viable proposition for all parties, especially the clients themselves?
* Is there adequate understanding of the regulatory issues involved in running such funds?
* Are such funds likely to survive the commission-free/remuneration policies expected from the final guidelines to come out of the RDR?
* Do the funds comply with FSA guidelines on DIFs?
Support network is growing
A new trade association for companies associated with running their own portfolio-style funds, the Investment Funds Association, is a source of contact and support for its members and a centre of influence with the regulator. The nascent body (ifassociation.co.uk) has a growing membership that includes service providers, and many advisers who run their own branded portfolio-style funds. It may well become an essential forum for parties interested in this sector of the funds industry.
The target of regulations
The FSA has made it clear that its new guidelines on DIFs are not aimed at fund managers, collective scheme operators or private client investment managers whose investment management is central to their business proposition. These groups are already well regulated. They may be affected by the guidelines on DIFs, however, if their appointment as manager or their ongoing investment approach or accountability is under the control of the distributor of the funds in question.
The guidelines focus on several areas of responsibility that together ensure advisers are treating their customers fairly. In essence an adviser must be demonstrably competent, will be aware of, and will manage, any conflicts of interest, is obliged to be independent and deliver only suitable solutions, and must communicate all of these considerations to the client. Included in these issues will be those relating to costs and remuneration.
If this sounds off-putting then take heart: what is genuinely in the best interests of clients will undoubtedly pass muster with the FSA.
Nothing to fear
Regulation on DIFs is there to assist and protect clients and not to deny them the most effective and contemporary investment management solutions.
The regulator has an unenviable task of weeding out the incompetent, unethical or lazy among us. The competent, professional, ethical and conscientious adviser has nothing to fear.
The establishment of well-managed, portfolio-style collective funds will be a major benefit to all participants, advisers as well as clients.
Paul Wilcox,
Chairman & Technical Director, WAY Group.
Allen Taylor
10.12.09
Nice writing. You are on my RSS reader now so I can read more from you down the road.
Allen Taylor
Louie Bags
05.04.10
I have to say, every time I come to wayblog.co.uk you have another fascinating article up. A friend of mine was telling me about this topic several weeks ago. I think I will e-mail them the link here and see what they say.
Leave a Reply