About This Blog
Paul Wilcox, founding director, is Chairman and Technical Director of the WAY Group.
Paul will regularly be offering his views and opinions on a wide range of the financial issues of the day. Don’t miss what he has to say!
Recent Posts
- Homer says ‘Doh’ to DOTAS
- As the smoke clears we begin to see the flames
- Going for gold – 5 reasons to consider
- Don’t sit on the fence – you’ll only get splinters!
- IHT – avoid but don’t evade
Categories
- Adviser Funds
- Budget
- Capital Gains Tax
- Collective Funds
- DIFs
- Discretionary Management
- Economy
- Financial Legislation
- Financial Planning
- Gold
- HMRC
- IFAs
- IHT Mitigation
- Investment Management
- Investment Portfolios
- ISAs
- News
- Nil Rate Band
- Pre-Owned Assets Tax
- Professional Advisers
- Recession
- Regulation
- Tax Planning
- Trusts
Archives
- August 2010
- May 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- October 2009
- August 2009
- June 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- April 2008
- November 2007
- October 2007
- August 2007
- March 2007
- October 2006
Search This Blog
Subscribe
Bookmark & Share
Don’t sit on the fence – you’ll only get splinters!
With at least one budget and at least one election in prospect for 2010, WAY Investment Services Ltd’s Technical Manager Mark Benson says that there is no time to delay before putting in place IHT mitigation plans for your clients. Given the average gestation period of an IHT case from agreement to settlement and with the (first) budget possibly a month away, the time to start is really today.
A recent IFA enquiry caused me to open the file of a WAY Inheritor Plan settled in February 2004 with an investment of £1,100,000. A number of thoughts sprung to mind such as how growth of over £300,000 in the investment value since then is safely out of the estate of the settlor and thus not subject to IHT on their death, and how in a year’s time the whole trust fund should also fall out of the estate at the end of the 7 year inter-vivos period. The overriding thought that came to mind however was “£1.1m transferred into a flexible trust – those were the days!” Whilst cases of such a size are unfortunately rather rare, it is interesting to reflect on how easily planning could be put in place for such amounts prior to the surprise change to the IHT rules in the 2006 Budget, which shut the door on PET based transfers to discretionary or interest in possession settlements. Nowadays unfortunately our settlor could not put much more than the amount of growth they have enjoyed into trust without breaching the nil rate band and generating a lifetime IHT charge of 20%.
There is a cautionary tale here as 2010 promises to be something of a white knuckle ride for tax planning as the political parties try to balance the challenge of dealing with the financial crisis with the desire to be generous in their manifesto promises ahead of the election. What is certain is that we must have one budget and one election this year. However, whilst May 6th remains a solid favourite for the date of the election – in particular since local elections are already scheduled for that day and cash-strapped local authorities could do without paying for two polls within a few weeks – the odds on the Conservatives as favourites to win that election have lengthened somewhat as the opinion polling shows a narrowing of their lead. With the likelihood of a change of government and the possibility of a hung parliament we cannot discount the possibility of at least one more budget and perhaps one more election this year.
When considering the dismal state of the nation’s finances and the unconvincing emergence from recession, it would seem that there is one thing we can be certain about: The forthcoming budget(s) will make the tax code more hostile to our clients’ income and capital. It is possible that the availability of trust based IHT planning might be attacked itself, akin to the changes introduced in 2006. Moreover there is also the strong possibility that an unfavourable change to the rate of income tax, CGT or IHT would dilute the savings on offer. Some may argue that the Conservatives have pledged to increase the IHT nil rate band to £1m in the first term of a prospective government, however we feel that given the fiscal challenges that lie ahead this might be a policy that remains an aspiration only. Any prospect of a first term introduction surely lies nearer the last year of the parliament.
The prospect for the next few years is that IHT will remain a challenge to succession planning, and if another aggressive attack on the use of trusts is made we might in time look back on the present as another golden opportunity that has passed. Where clients are hesitant to put plans in place due to the uncertain future, their minds can be put at ease by the recommendation of flexible arrangements such as the WAY Inheritor Plans. Our plans can adapt to the client’s changing circumstances by granting flexible powers to the trustees and also to changes to the rates of lifetime taxes by (uniquely in the market) offering access to collective investments and offshore bond wrappers. Furthermore, since clients are limited to investments within the nil rate band it is necessary to start at a younger age and (hopefully) make repeated use of the nil rate band over the years to come.
At some point in 2010 a government will face up to the reality of our financial crisis and present the bill for the remedy to taxpayers. Those still sitting on the fence at that time will suddenly feel the splinters!
Mark Benson, TEP CertPFS,
Technichal Manager, WAY Investment Services Limited.
19th February 2010.